Новости
12.04.2024
Поздравляем с Днём космонавтики!
08.03.2024
Поздравляем с Международным Женским Днем!
23.02.2024
Поздравляем с Днем Защитника Отечества!
Оплата онлайн
При оплате онлайн будет
удержана комиссия 3,5-5,5%








Способ оплаты:

С банковской карты (3,5%)
Сбербанк онлайн (3,5%)
Со счета в Яндекс.Деньгах (5,5%)
Наличными через терминал (3,5%)

STATE DYNAMICS OF ZOOPLANKTON IN THE GULF REGION OF TYUB-KARAGAN

Авторы:
Город:
Атырау
ВУЗ:
Дата:
01 июля 2017г.

Abstract

Composition, structure, quantitative indicators and seasonal dynamics of zooplankton were normal for this region. Similar seasonal dynamics of zooplankton quantitative indicators was noted in 2014. The average annual values of zooplankton population in 2015 did not change with respect to 2014. The biomass of zooplankton has decreased from 2014 to 2015 due to the less number of large jellyfish.

Keywords: The Caspian Sea, the Gulf of Tyub-Karagan, zooplankton


INTRODUCTION

The structure of the Tyub-Karagan has brought a hope of oil and gas availability according to results of the seismic works and engineering - geological surveys, but the results of the exploration drilling activities on the structure have refuted the projections of availability of hydrocarbon reserves [1-2].

In our opinion, the oil exploration on this structure will not be stopped, because the promising oil structures were opened in the north and south of the Caspian Sea structure, that's why it is necessary to survey the hydrobionts background state in this region.

In this regard, the natural resource users and Atyrau and Mangystau region Akimats continue executing those works.

Earlier we published the results of monitoring activities carried out in 2014 [1-2].

As in previous years, the main three species of zooplankton were found: rotifers, cladocerans and copepods, with copepods (48.87%) predominant in species composition and population, and other species (78%) in biomass.

SUBJECT AND METHODS OF RESEARCH

The Tyub-Karagan Gulf area was chosen as the subject of research. Zooplankton samples were taken from the surface layer of water by the Apstein net and fixed with 4% formalin. Then they were concentrated by settling method. The samples were processed in laboratory conditions according to generally accepted procedures [3 - 5]; the taxonomic composition, population (specimen per 1 m3) and biomass (mg per 1 m3) of zooplankton were determined.

RESULTS OF THE RESEARCH

As in 2014, the water samples for research were taken from 9 observation stations, three from the north, three from the east and three from the north-east sides. The species composition of zooplankton is given in Table 1.

Table 1. Species composition of zooplankton organisms per seasons in 2015.

 

Species composition

Number of species

W

Sp.

Sum.

A

Rotifers

2

3

3

-

Cladocerans

-

-

5

-

Copepods

5

4

6

5

Others

2

5

8

5

Total taxons

10

12

23

10

 

The table shows that the copepods were predominant during winter period of the research, while the other species were predominant in summer and in autumn.

Tables 2 and 3 show the population and biomass of zooplankton in 2015, and Table 4 shows the comparative average population and biomass in 2014 and 2015.

Figures 1-4 show the diagram of average population and biomass in 2014 and 2015.

The average number of zooplankton in Tyub-Karagan Gulf increased from spring to summer and decreased by autumn and winter in 2015 [6]. The mean values of biomass increased from spring to autumn and decreased in winter. Copepods and rotifers dominated the numbers/population in spring and summer, copepods – in autumn and winter. The copepods mostly dominated the biomass, together with facultative planktons in spring, and together with the cladocerans in summer. The facultative planktons took the dominant position by biomass in autumn. The diversity of zooplankton in terms of the number of taxons and their uniformity was maximum in summer and in spring and decreased by autumn and winter. The composition, structure, quantitative indicators and seasonal dynamics of zooplankton were normal for this region. Similar seasonal dynamics of quantitative indicators of zooplankton was noted in 2014. The average annual values of zooplankton population in 2015 did not change with respect to 2014. The biomass of zooplankton has decreased from 2014 to 2015 due to the less number of large jellyfish.

Table 2. The population of main zooplankton groups per seasons of 2015.

 

Stations

specimen/m3

Rotifers

Cladoceran

Copepod

Others

Total

W*

Sp

S

A

W

S

p

S

A

W

Sp

S

A

W

Sp

S

A

W

Sp

S

A

1

 

108

 

591

 

8080

 

0

 

0

 

0

 

466

 

0

 

97

 

761

 

10807

 

3443

 

17

 

358

 

5161

 

908

 

222

 

1710

 

24513

 

4351

2

10

320

50

0

0

0

80

0

0

910

5383

3615

0

390

1760

3376

10

1620

7273

6991

3

352

205

23201

0

0

0

1576

0

341

74

18879

4239

34

11

8797

938

727

290

52453

5177

4

83

241

9559

0

0

0

621

0

77

121

22034

12694

11

52

3648

1435

171

414

35862

14129



 

5

72

557

18678

0

0

0

598

0

260

285

28885

4867

116

57

6052

382

448

899

54213

5249

6

155

619

22004

0

0

0

1160

0

354

223

17082

43462

22

15

4528

5812

530

858

44773

49274

7

38

173

10534

0

0

0

918

0

108

178

28870

5797

19

25

7962

1000

165

376

48285

6797

8

 

118

 

347

 

10156

 

0

 

0

 

767

 

276

 

147

 

12186

 

49

 

12

 

2977

 

443

 

506

 

26087

9

207

323

27708

0

0

0

4557

0

319

95

15151

49273

112

35

7823

8033

638

453

55240

57306

Averag

e

127

375

14441

0

0

0

1194

0

203

310

17697

15924

42

106

5412

2736

373

792

38744

18659

W* - season

 

Table 3. The biomass of main zooplankton groups per seasons of 2015.

 

Stations

mg/m3

Rotifers

Cladoceran

Copepod

Others

Total

W*

Sp

S

A

W

Sp

S

A

W

Sp

S

A

W

Sp

S

A

W

Sp

S

A

1

 

0,14

 

0,49

 

6,47

0,00

 

0,00

 

0,00

 

30,48

0,00

 

3,12

 

1,29

 

13,94

 

30,10

 

0,11

 

0,71

 

14,51

 

2,95

 

3,37

 

2,48

 

65,41

 

33,06

2

 

0,02

 

0,34

 

0,03

0,00

 

0,00

 

0,00

 

3,64

0,00

 

0,00

 

1,55

 

13,50

 

10,50

 

0,00

 

2,92

 

2,65

 

9,05

 

0,02

 

4,81

 

19,82

 

19,55

3

0,43

0,18

19,67

0,00

0,00

0,00

66,96

0,00

11,48

0,18

41,63

14,99

0,47

0,01

27,18

3,21

12,38

0,37

155,44

18,20

4

0,10

0,20

7,68

0,00

0,00

0,00

39,23

0,00

1,75

0,49

43,65

72,50

0,01

0,39

17,99

5,44

1,86

1,08

108,55

77,93

5

0,07

0,53

17,06

0,00

0,00

0,00

47,38

0,00

7,08

0,78

51,49

14,00

1,58

0,45

26,33

2,66

8,73

1,76

142,26

16,66

6

0,18

0,60

18,35

0,00

0,00

0,00

32,24

0,00

10,59

0,35

45,92

168,53

0,12

0,07

9,44

779,09

10,89

1,03

105,96

947,62

7

0,05

0,15

7,82

0,00

0,00

0,00

31,03

0,00

3,51

0,56

63,97

20,18

0,15

0,44

15,67

1800,86

3,72

1,15

118,49

1821,0

4

8

0,14

0,30

9,46

0,00

0,00

32,15

10,38

0,45

15,39

0,13

0,18

12,21

10,65

0,93

69,20

9

0,24

0,24

20,48

0,00

0,00

0,00

119,64

0,00

4,08

0,19

43,46

202,20

2,68

0,36

40,18

1352,57

7,00

0,80

223,76

1554,7

7

Average

0,15

0,34

11,89

0,00

0,00

0,00

44,75

0,00

5,78

0,65

37,00

66,63

0,58

0,61

18,46

494,48

6,51

1,60

112,10

561,10

 

Table 4. Comparative quantitative indicators of zooplankton per seasons for 2014 and 2015

 

Rotifers

Cladoceran

Copepod

Others

Total

W

Sp

S

A

W

Sp

S

A

W

Sp

S

A

W

Sp

S

A

W

Sp

S

A

population, specimen/m3

2014

191

7571

60

437

0

0

5866

0

292

1029

25094

1547

11

78

13980

1066

493

8679

45000

3051

2015

127

375

1444

1

0

0

0

1194

0

203

310

17697

15924

42

106

5412

2736

373

792

38744

18659

Biomass, mg/m3

2014

0,19

7,25

0,06

0,25

0,00

0,00

194,59

0,00

3,27

0,97

85,05

5,74

0,70

18,85

72,21

998,10

4,17

27,07

351,92

1004,09

2015

 

0,15

 

0,34

 

11,89

 

0,00

 

0,00

 

0,00

 

44,75

 

0,00

 

5,78

 

0,65

 

37,00

 

66,63

 

0,58

 

0,61

 

18,46

 

494,48

 

6,51

 

1,60

 

112,10

 

561,10



These figures show that the copepods were predominant (49 and 58 percent accordingly) by population/numbers in 2014 and 2015. If the second place in 2014 goes to other kinds (26%), then the second place in 2015 goes to rotifers (26%), while the cladocerans were less than the others in both 2014 and 2015 (10% and 2% accordingly).



If the copepods were predominant in population, then other species of zooplankton dominated the biomass in both 2014 and 2015 (79 and 75 percent accordingly). The second place on biomass was taken by cladocerans (14%) in 2014, then they moved to the third place in 2015, by giving way to copepods (16%). And rotifers turned out to be the last (0.4 and 2 percent accordingly).

Proceeding from the above:

In connection with the above, the maximum population of zooplankton in the Tyub-Karagan Gulf was recorded in the summer in both 2014 and 2015, and the maximum biomass level was in autumn. The population was mostly dominated by  copepods, in summer – rotifers. In summer the biomass was generally dominated by facultative planktons, and among the latter – large jellyfish. In autumn, the dominant position on biomass was taken by copepods, in some parts of the water area – jellyfish.

The population of zooplankton in Tyub-Karagan Gulf remained at the same level as in 2014, or slightly increased

 

Reference books

 

1.        А. Кеnzhjegaliyev, А.А. Abylgazieva, А.К. Shаhmanova. Condition of zooplankton in Tyub-Karagan //American Scientific Journal № 6 (6) / 2016, с.4-6

2.        А. Кеnzhjegaliyev, А.А. Abylgazieva, А.К. Shаhmanova. Condition of hydrobionts in Tyub-Karagan bay// HERALD TarSU of a name of M.Kh. Dulati «Nature and problems of anthroposphere» international science journal - № 3, - 2016. -р.65-72

3.        Procedure of hydrobiology and fish industry research in Kazakhstan”s water reservoirs (plankton, zoobenthos), Almaty 2006, p.27

4.        Procedure of biogeosenose research in internal reservoirs-М.:Publisher «Nauka», 1975.- p. 240

5.        Method procedure of hydro biological analyses of surface water and bed silt L.: Publisher «Hydrometeoizdat», 1983.- p.78-86

6.        Мarine ecological research. Аnnual report. -2015. -р. 1295